Giant Film Analysis: Naseem Hamed Movie Starring Brosnan Lacks the Punch

The movie boasts a impressive ensemble, depicting the real-life tale of Irish boxing trainer Ingle, who guided a cheeky Sheffield youth from Middle Eastern migrant parents. Dubbed “Prince” Naseem Hamed, the fighter was coached to confront prejudice and transformed into a media-friendly titleholder in the 1990s. The trainer cultivated his showboating confidence and lethal fists, but after becoming rich, Hamed turned against his coach, excluding him and making him a blend of John Falstaff and Broadway Danny Rose.

Cast and Characters

Brosnan portrays the trainer; Amir El-Masry takes on the role of the prince, and Toby Stephens appears as the assertive London promoter Frank Warren, who saw the goldmine that the coach had discovered.

Film’s Shortcomings

Yet, the movie honestly lacks the fighter’s agility: the fight scenes run smoothly, but the all-important drama in between is consistently flat and one-note. It lacks subtlety or contrast in the depiction of Hamed himself, and the actor, an otherwise excellent talent, isn’t given the chance to show any depth or much of what might make his character really interesting – although he’s obviously been working out and looks very plausible in the ring.

Problems with Script and Sound

The drama is repeatedly lumbered with functional, expositional dialogue that inform you exactly what is happening and what we are supposed to be thinking (“Your journey began your career at seven years old …”). It is the kind of dialogue that streaming-TV executives call “second-screen”, making sure you know what’s going on while you’re viewing the movie but also glancing at your device. Additionally, the background music is overpowering, at times nearly overwhelming, particularly in the moment where Hamed gets overexcited calling on the promoter in his luxurious residence.

Acting and Pivotal Scenes

Although El-Masry and Brosnan do their considerable utmost, their relationship doesn’t quite comes to life, and the major fight scenes are frequently anticlimactically truncated. A key scene is certainly when, provoked beyond endurance in the gym one day by the boxer as a misguided “elder”, Ingle in fact proposes to step into the ring and box him. All present in the room is shocked and uncomfortable. How exactly is this extremely unwise confrontation going to play out? How precisely the outcome? Surely the champion is going to kill him? Alternatively will he sentimentally hold back? It’s not clear.

Bright Spots and Comedy

This isn’t to imply that there aren’t some nice jabs. Brosnan elicits humor when Ingle informs a journalist what he’s teaching the youths from his neighborhood: to oppose prejudice and when you encounter a offender, “Punch him in the groin”. It’s funny too when the boxer squirms at the ridiculous stunts Ingle makes him do in the early days: posing as the “monster from the Middle East”.

Plot and Conclusion

Regarding the rift, the film depicts this as being exacerbated by a tell-all book that Ingle is allegedly written (a plot point clearly adapted from prior material), and there is an interestingly conceived last discussion – however the heartfelt homage that Hamed is supposed to have paid to Ingle after his death is only mentioned in the end titles, and not shown on film. Some engaging content in this film, but the punches fail to connect.

Giant was shown at the London film festival and is available in British and Irish theaters from January 9.

Vickie Rivas
Vickie Rivas

Environmental scientist and writer passionate about sustainable development and renewable energy solutions.